Dampak Telemedisin terhadap Tingkat Kepuasan Pasien di Beberapa Negara Maju dan Berkembang: Tinjauan Sistematis
Isi Artikel Utama
Page: 1192-1204
Abstrak
Telemedisin adalah teknologi telekomunikasi dalam perawatan kesehatan yang telah berkembang pesat, terutama selama pandemi COVID-19. Implementasinya bervariasi antara negara maju dan negara berkembang, sehingga menimbulkan pertanyaan tentang dampaknya terhadap kepuasan pasien dan faktor-faktor yang memengaruhinya. Studi ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi dampak telemedisin terhadap kepuasan pasien di negara maju dan negara berkembang serta untuk mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor kunci yang memengaruhi kepuasan guna memberikan informasi untuk perbaikan model penyampaian telemedisin. Tinjauan sistematis dilakukan menggunakan basis data PubMed, Scopus, dan Web of Science. Pencarian menggunakan kata kunci yang terkait dengan telemedisin dan kepuasan pasien. Kriteria inklusi berfokus pada artikel yang ditinjau sejawat yang diterbitkan antara tahun 2020 dan 2025, menghasilkan 14 studi (tujuh dari negara maju dan tujuh dari negara berkembang) yang dianalisis. Data diekstrak dan disintesis mengikuti pedoman PRISMA. Analisis mengidentifikasi 14 studi yang memenuhi syarat. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa telemedisin umumnya memiliki dampak positif pada kepuasan pasien, dengan tingkat kepuasan tinggi yang dilaporkan di berbagai lingkungan. Misalnya, studi dari Swedia dan India melaporkan bahwa sekitar 78-93% pasien menyatakan puas atau bersedia menggunakan kembali layanan telemedisin. Namun, beberapa tantangan telah diidentifikasi, khususnya di negara-negara berkembang seperti Indonesia dan Filipina, termasuk biaya layanan, infrastruktur digital yang terbatas, dan literasi teknologi yang rendah
Unduhan
Rincian Artikel

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Referensi
World Health Organization, “WHO-2019-nCoV-essential_health_services-2020.2-eng,” Geneva: World Health Organization, 2020.
C. Scott Kruse, P. Karem, K. Shifflett, L. Vegi, K. Ravi, and M. Brooks, “Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: A systematic review,” Jan. 01, 2018, SAGE Publications Ltd. doi: 10.1177/1357633X16674087.
K. B. Shiferaw and E. A. Mehari, “Internet use and ehealth literacy among health-care professionals in a resource limited setting: A cross-sectional survey,” Adv. Med. Educ. Pract., vol. 10, pp. 563–570, 2019, doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S205414.
S. N. Gajarawala and J. N. Pelkowski, “Telehealth Benefits and Barriers,” Journal for Nurse Practitioners, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 218–221, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.nurpra.2020.09.013.
S. Alexandra, P. W. Handayani, and F. Azzahro, “Indonesian hospital telemedicine acceptance model: the influence of user behavior and technological dimensions,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 12, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08599.
K. M. Bellizzi, K. Ligus, E. Fritzson, C. Salafia, T. Sanft, and C. L. Park, “Disruption in Cancer Care During Early Survivorship due to the COVID-19 Pandemic and Patient Satisfaction with Telemedicine,” Supportive Care in Cancer, vol. 31, no. 5, May 2023, doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07767-7.
R. S. W. Alyahya, “The satisfaction of clients and caregivers with telehealth speech-language pathology services,” Digit. Health, vol. 11, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1177/20552076241313163.
C. Rockler Meurling, E. Adell, M. Wolff, S. Calling, V. Milos Nymberg, and B. Borgström Bolmsjö, “Telemedicine in Swedish primary health care - a web-based survey exploring patient satisfaction,” BMC Health Serv. Res., vol. 23, no. 1, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09133-z.
D. Storan et al., “Satisfaction with telemedicine-delivered inflammatory bowel disease care depends on disease activity, personality and economic factors,” Frontline Gastroenterol., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 132–137, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2022-102198.
A. N. Mason, T. Naito, S. Fukushima, K. Asano, K. Yamaji, and R. Kuwatsuru, “Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Japanese Telemedicine Patient Satisfaction,” Health Serv. Insights, vol. 17, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1177/11786329241280864.
G. Alhassan, A. Bosnak, and E. Hamurtekin, “Perceived satisfaction and outcomes from drug information center services provided with a telehealth approach,” Niger. J. Clin. Pract., vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 2053–2061, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_552_22.
F. Sorrentino et al., “Remote Check as a tele-health instrument for cochlear implant recipients: Analysis of impact and feasibility of application.,” American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery, vol. 45, no. 4, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104294.
V. K. Viswanathan, A. P. Shetty, C. Murugan, R. A. Kavishkar, R. M. Kanna, and S. B. Rajasekaran, “The perspectives of patients and spine surgeons on the effectiveness and reliability of telemedicine consultations for spine ailments - A glimpse at the Indian scenario,” Indian Spine Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 82–88, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.4103/isj.isj_104_21.
D. C. Wu, X. Zhao, and J. Wu, “Online Physician-Patient Interaction and Patient Satisfaction: Empirical Study of the Internet Hospital Service,” J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 25, 2023, doi: 10.2196/39089.
S. Niyyati et al., “Patient Perceptions of Telehealth for Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Follow-up Study,” Can. J. Diabetes, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 579-586.e6, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2023.05.005.
S. J. White, A. Nguyen, P. Roger, T. Tse, J. A. Cartmill, and S. M. Willcock, “Experiences of telehealth in general practice in Australia: research protocol for a mixed-methods study,” BJGP Open, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–6, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0187.
A. V. G. Noceda et al., “Patient satisfaction with telemedicine in the Philippines during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods study,” BMC Health Serv. Res., vol. 23, no. 1, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09127-x.
M. Á. Cuevas-Budhart et al., “Patient experience in automated peritoneal dialysis with telemedicine monitoring during the COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico: Qualitative study,” Nurs. Open, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1092–1101, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1002/nop2.1377.